Insights worth sharing

Motives for better Engineering

Coulomb's wedge theory
of earth pressure

Explore horizontal earth pressure,
Coulomb's theory, and its applications.
Compare geotechnical results and
understand the trial wedge method's nuances.

See more
Baltimore bridge collapse:
What structural engineers can do

Explore the technical content on vessel collision
to calculate the annual frequency of bridge component collapse.

See more
Seismic Isolation in Structural Design:
Concepts and Applications

Introducing the concept of seismic isolation design.

See more

System Method for P-Delta Effects

Y.S LeeJun 03, 2024

Offshore structure and Wave

Harold S.Y HaJan 31, 2024

 

FEM Analysis of Tunnel Construction in São Paulo

Introduction:


As a Geo-structural Engineer deeply involved in the field of tunnel construction and soil mechanics, my recent webinar focused on an area of growing importance: the behavior of NATM (New Austrian Tunneling Method) tunnels in the porous clays of São Paulo. The rapid urbanization globally necessitates the expansion of underground spaces, and São Paulo's unique geotechnical conditions offer a rich study ground. This article, an extension of my webinar, aims to share key insights and research findings with engineering professionals worldwide on this global engineer knowledge-sharing platform.

Structural Dynamics of MDOF Systems under Free Vibration: Basic Concepts

Jaydee N. LuceroJan 30, 2024

One of the first concepts that is being taught in earthquake engineering classes is determination of dynamic properties of structures such as frequency and period. Under the action of earthquakes or external forces, the structure moves, and this movement is heavily influenced by its dynamic properties.

Dynamics of High-Speed Railways in Midas Civil

Lukáš JuříčekJan 29, 2024

Introduction

 

The modern approach to railway dynamics is shifting from quasi-static calculations with dynamic coefficients to more accurate dynamic analyses, especially when it comes to high-speed railways with speeds exceeding 200 km/h. The danger of resonance at critical speeds is real, and a simple dynamic factor may not always capture it. Excessive vertical acceleration could lead to:

 

Instability of the railway track bed and rapid degradation of its geometry.

Inadequate contact between the rail and wheel.

Increased fatigue stress on the main structure of the bridge.

Discomfort for passengers.

Studies by the ERRI D214 Committee, part of the European rail research institute, have influenced the guidelines and recommendations embedded in current Eurocodes.

 

Criteria and Requirements

 

Dynamic analysis and acceleration checks are governed by standards such as ČSN EN 1992-2 and ČSN EN 1991-2 pertaining to bridge loads. The maximum peak values of vertical acceleration are crucial for:

 

Railways with gravel beds (to ensure the stability of the gravel bed).

Directly driven bridge decks (to maintain wheel-rail contact).

In these calculations, certain frequency shapes, as defined in ČSN EN 1990 A2.4.4.2.1, need to be included. These take into account bending and torsional shapes, especially in cases of eccentric tracks.

 

 

Structural Stiffness and Mass

 

The structure's stiffness and mass play a significant role in its dynamic behavior. Resonance peaks occur when the frequency of the load aligns with the structure's natural frequency. Overestimating bridge stiffness can lead to inaccurate predictions of these resonance speeds. The stiffness for composite sections should consider the cracked section properties.

 

In terms of the bridge's mass, maximum dynamic effects from loading happen at resonance peaks. The railway bed should be considered with a minimal volumetric mass, dry, clean, and of minimal thickness for lower estimates, and with maximum volumetric mass, saturated, dirty, and maximum thickness for upper estimates.

 

Train Loading Models

 

Loading models as per ČSN EN 1991-2 6.4.6.1 include:

 

HLSM-A for spans > 7 m, continuous and complex structures.

HLSM-B for simple spans < 7 m.

Real trains, with speeds guided by EN 1991-2 6.4.5.2 parameters.

 

Modal Analysis

 

The Lanczos method is recommended as it's compatible with the consistent matrix. The recommended time step for linear time-dependent analysis should be smaller than the maximum natural frequency of the highest shape used in the modal analysis.

 

Damping

 

Modal damping is consistent across all frequencies.

 

Train Load Generator in Midas Civil

 

This is dependent on:

 

The system choice from A1-A10.

The train's speed.

Distance between nodes/elements.

The wheel function which exhibits a linear distribution of force over time.

 

Assessment

 

The vertical acceleration assessment, using the example provided, indicates that it's below the threshold value, making it satisfactory. Internal design forces and dynamic factors are governed by ČSN EN 1991-2 6.4.6.1.

 

Conclusion

 

High train speeds can easily destabilize structures. Small, single-span bridges are predominantly susceptible. Inputs of stiffness and mass are crucial to the final structural response.

During modal superposition, selecting an adequate number of natural shapes is vital since the final response depends on their linear combination. Use modal damping as per standards unless precise data is available. The train load generator significantly speeds up the analysis process.

 

By optimizing the design and analysis based on these principles, engineers can ensure that bridges and tracks are not only safe but also comfortable for passengers even at high speeds. This integration of high-tech tools like Midas Civil with the principles from established standards ensures a reliable and efficient design process for high-speed railways.

 

Key Insights on Seismic Design's Response Modification Factor

Gyusik JeonJan 29, 2024

1. Introduction

Revisiting Seismic Design After Türkiye/Syria Quake Part 2 - Wave and Structure

Gyusik JeonJan 25, 2024

3. The correlation between seismic waves and structures

Lining Surcharge Load for Tunnel Structure Analysis

Steve ChoiJan 25, 2024

1. Overview and Necessity of Review on Surcharge Load

Wind Turbine Foundation Design: Advanced Stiffness Verification - Part 2

CivilOnly20YearsJan 25, 2024

Ⅲ. Verification of Foundation Stiffness Applied to The Design

Wind Turbine Foundation Design: Pile Foundation Modeling - Part 1

CivilOnly20YearsJan 25, 2024

Ⅰ. Introduction

 

Strut-tie Model and Correct Reinforcement